🔗 Share this article

• Published
  9 minutes ago
• 4 Comments

The Australian team to fight back and win the opening Ashes Test as decisively as they did, one questions what scars will be inflicted upon the England team.

How will they respond for the remaining series?

Surprising Comeback

I believe anyone anticipated what happened on Saturday. When you examine the number of overs taken to complete the game, it was the longest format on fast forward.

England were clearly dominant at the midday break on the second day, 105 ahead with nine wickets in hand. The pitch was still offering assistance. It looked so tough for Australia to re-enter the match.

Shot Selection Woes

From that point, England's shot selection was their major downfall. The Australian bowler put in arguably his poorest performance in an national colors in the initial batting, then completely reversed in the subsequent innings to be the driving force for the recovery.

England's batsmen were out attempting to strike balls wide of off-stump, in the air, through the covers.

Trying to score off those bowls, with those strokes, is the precise action you just do not do as a batsman in Australia.

Adaptation Issues

It demonstrated that England had not done their preparation, are not able to adjust or are reluctant to adapt.

There is much discussion about England's approach, their aggressive style. I observed it firsthand during the 2023 Ashes in the UK. Under Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum, they can be quite rigid when it comes to sticking with that method.

It is acceptable on slow, low pitches. On the fast, bouncy pitches of Australia it is a method full of danger. If England fail to reconsider, they will struggle for the whole series.

Bowling Perspective

As a bowler, I would have consistently believed in the game against this England team.

I depended on my accuracy, backing myself to land the identical area around off stump, with a bit of bounce and nip.

Even if this England team was performing strongly, I'd be eagerly anticipating at the idea of facing them, aware a single error could bring multiple wickets.

Skill and Resilience

There are occasions when England can be a high-quality team. They have good players. Competent cricketers have ability, but exceptional athletes have the psychological strength and attitude to be flexible enough for the conditions.

They would been stunned at the way events developed at Perth Stadium, devastated at the way they were beaten. Now we will see what they are capable of. Even as a true blue Australian, part of me wants to see them adapt, just to show they can improve.

Pace Attack Issues

It was similar with their bowling. England's attack was very good on the opening day, then lost the plot when they were attacked on the following day.

In the longest format, all disciplines require a backup strategy. Quite often it seems England have one method, then nowhere to go if that does not work.

'Where has this come from?' - The dismissal as England lose third wicket in quick succession

Head's Masterclass

In defense to England's pace attack, they were confronted with one of the memorable Ashes innings by Travis Head.

His 69-ball hundred was the second quickest by an Australian batsman in the historic rivalry, 12 balls behind Adam Gilchrist at the Perth ground 19 years ago – a match I played in.

My old mate Gilchrist said the performance was the better of the two. I concur. Considering the difficulty of the wicket and the context of the match situation, Head's knock will go down as a highlight of cricket lore.

Tactical Moves

It was a bold and brave move for Australia to promote Head in the lineup for the second innings.

The opener has faced criticism for being unable to open in either innings. He had back spasms after playing the sport the day before the Test, but I don't think the two were connected.

When Khawaja failed on the opening day, Australia advanced Marnus Labuschagne and got bogged down.

In moving the aggressive batsman, who has the experience of opening in limited overs, Australia were able to go on offensive to England.

Upcoming Decisions

Now there is the question of what Australia will do for the second Test. I'd like to see them stick with the method of aggression at the beginning.

That could mean Head remains, meaning a player such as Beau Webster enters the batting lineup, or return to his position and Mitchell Marsh or the keeper could move to the opening. It would be difficult for the batsman, but occasionally you have to do what the rival team would find most challenging.

Series Outlook

After the first Test was controlled by the bowlers, some are wondering if the remaining series will be short, low-scoring Tests.

The venue is pretty much the quickest, liveliest pitch in the global cricket, so the batters should get a some relief from here onward.

It is not entirely about the pitch. Credit has to be awarded to the pacemen for delivering the ball in the right place so often. Overall, batsmen on both sides will need to look at how they were dismissed.

Crucial Next Test

Now we move on to the next venue, and the vastly different day-night conditions for the second Test.

In 2006-07, I was a member of the national side that dominated England to win 5-0. Ashes series in this nation have a tendency of slipping from England rapidly.

At the present, England are only 1-0 down. There would be no recovery from 2-0, which is why the venue is such a massive game.

They need to adjust, or the Ashes will be gone again.