🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ councils is set to be cut by over 50%, after a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations often spent years generating local support and pushing their councils to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to create other types of wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.